Skip to main content
UK - Financial Adviser
Select Region Select User Type
  • Global
    • Home
  • UK Investors
    • Financial Adviser
    • Private Investor
  • International Investors
    • Private Investor
    • Professional Investor
  • Fund Centre
    • Our Funds
      • Equities
        • Rathbone Global Opportunities Fund
        • Rathbone Greenbank Global Sustainability Fund
        • Rathbone Income Fund Fund
        • Rathbone UK Opportunities Fund
      • Fixed Income
        • Rathbone Ethical bond Fund
        • Rathbone High Quality Bond Fund
        • Rathbone Strategic Bond Fund
        • Rathbone Greenbank Global Sustainable Bond Fund
      • Multi-Asset
        • Rathbone Greenbank Multi-Asset Portfolios
        • Rathbone MULTI-ASSET PORTFOLIOS
      • Sustainable
        • Rathbone Greenbank Global Sustainable Bond Fund
        • Rathbone Greenbank Global Sustainability Fund
        • Rathbone Greenbank Multi-Asset Portfolios
    • Literature Library
    • Consumer Duty
    • Prices and Performance
    • Glossary of Terms and FAQs
  • Strategies
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Multi-Asset
    • Sustainable
  • Our Clients
    • Private Investor
    • Financial Adviser
    • International Private Investor
    • International Financial Adviser
  • Rathbones
  • Global Home
  • Insights
    • Fund Insights
    • In the know blog
    • Review of the week
    • The Sharpe End podcast
  • About us
    • About us
    • Our People
    • Awards
    • Media centre
    • Responsible Investing at Rathbones
  • Contact
Home Home

Search

  • Fund Centre
    • Our Funds
      • Equities
        • Rathbone Global Opportunities Fund
        • Rathbone Greenbank Global Sustainability Fund
        • Rathbone Income Fund Fund
        • Rathbone UK Opportunities Fund
      • Fixed Income
        • Rathbone Ethical bond Fund
        • Rathbone High Quality Bond Fund
        • Rathbone Strategic Bond Fund
        • Rathbone Greenbank Global Sustainable Bond Fund
      • Multi-Asset
        • Rathbone Greenbank Multi-Asset Portfolios
        • Rathbone MULTI-ASSET PORTFOLIOS
      • Sustainable
        • Rathbone Greenbank Global Sustainable Bond Fund
        • Rathbone Greenbank Global Sustainability Fund
        • Rathbone Greenbank Multi-Asset Portfolios
    • Literature Library
    • Consumer Duty
    • Prices and Performance
    • Glossary of Terms and FAQs
  • Strategies
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Multi-Asset
    • Sustainable
  • Our Clients
    • Private Investor
    • Financial Adviser
    • International Private Investor
    • International Financial Adviser
  • Rathbones
  • Global Home
  • Insights
    • Fund Insights
    • In the know blog
    • Review of the week
    • The Sharpe End podcast
  • About us
    • About us
    • Our People
    • Awards
    • Media centre
    • Responsible Investing at Rathbones
  • Contact
Home

Search

What’s in a name?

Industry veteran David Coombs, our head of multi-asset investments, gets cranky about lazy labelling and job name inflation as he dispenses 40 years’ wisdom to budding finance acolytes.

10 August 2023

Last week I sat on a panel answering the questions of a group of GCSE students considering a career in financial services. One of my pearls of wisdom was to be different, think independently and never be afraid to challenge the status quo if they want to flourish against the threat of AI. Not sure if I inspired them or scared them off to be honest, but at least they were given a dose of realism.

We were asked to introduce ourselves and give a quick summary of our careers so far. As mine began 40 years ago, that was some task! I told them my first investment job was in 1984 as a dividend clerk, having been transferred from the banking department after I failed as a records clerk.

They clearly had no idea what a clerk was. Today, I would have been an income collection executive (or perhaps just an excel worksheet), after transferring from being a client accounts facilitating manager (a website enquiries form).

We often see how things are bestowed new names to give the impression of modernity or more intrinsic worth. There’s nothing inherently wrong with this, I guess, although today you end up with some bizarre job titles. And after years of little wage inflation, we’ve definitely had job title inflation: US companies seem to be running out of ways to describe vice-presidents with minutely stratified seniority.

This is also true for products and services in the investment world. Model portfolio services are sold as a form of discretionary fund management and often referred to as bespoke solutions. Clearly, bespoke and models are as different as tailored suits and those bought off the rack. The latter should be significantly cheaper, as they’re made in bulk to suit as many people as possible. Yet they may not be the best option, unless you’re the standard fit. I am not saying a model is bad, but it should never be the default option.

Aligning labels with investors’ expectations

In my world, I get frustrated at the way any strategy with more than one asset class is defined as multi-asset. Although in the strictest definition this is true, I feel it’s very misleading and causes confusion among clients and regulators.

How has this come about? Well, since time immemorial both institutional and private client investment managers have managed ‘Balanced’ strategies, most often benchmarked against a composite set of market indices. The most famous of all being the 60/40 (equities/bonds) model. Note the word model again.

Again, there’s nothing wrong with this approach. The client picks the benchmark and the manager attempts to outperform (achieve alpha) by making allocations that are different to the benchmark. Passive managers invest in line with the benchmark and will structurally underperform by the level of the annual fees compounded. Of course, many active managers also underperform, so manager selection is key.

A true multi-asset approach, however, does not involve the use of a composite benchmark to set strategy. Instead, the manager targets the maximum return for a stated level of risk which matches the investor’s risk profile. Typically, the investment strategy is set by collating a portfolio of assets to achieve optimal returns on capital invested. That is, only the investments that meet the risk/return criteria make it into the strategy; there is no under or overweighting versus a benchmark. The manager has no benchmark asset allocation to guide him/her. This is why, in my opinion, there’s no such thing as a pure passive multi-asset fund.

I have often thought that a client who gives a manager a composite benchmark has taken most of the long-term asset allocation decisions themselves, letting the manager off the hook to a certain extent. The benchmark becomes the investment objective, rather than purely a measure of ability (or luck).

The Rathbone Multi-Asset Portfolio and Rathbone Greenbank Multi-Asset Portfolio funds that my team manage adopt a risk budget and then try to maximise the return from the investment universe available. This often means major asset classes are left out, such as investment-grade corporate bonds in years gone by when they offered paltry yields. So, I think our investors are guaranteed active management as if you have no benchmark asset allocation, there’s no chance of closet tracking. It does compound the importance of manager selection though: clients have to trust us to get it right and we must deliver.

The problem with multi-asset is that you need to offer a number of risk profiles, as one size definitely does not fit all. That’s why we now have five risk strategies in our ‘stable’, along with nine other portfolios that offer different currencies, domicile, income and sustainability. They are all managed individually from a bottom-up (security selection) and top-down (asset allocation) basis to ensure each uses its respective risk budget to the maximum efficiency.

Balanced (both passive and active) and multi-asset approaches can all be appropriate for different people, though my conviction is obviously in the latter. I do believe it’s time to distinguish clearly between the two and make it easier for buyers to make a suitable and informed decisions and to assess value.

By the way, we’re not escaping scrutiny by avoiding a benchmark. Funds/models can be monitored across all approaches using Sharpe or Sortino ratios, a way of ranking the best risk-adjusted performance. I believe these are the most relevant for our investors in any event as they speak to their return needs and their attitude to risk. This is why we named our podcast The Sharpe End.

Model portfolio services are not bespoke discretionary fund management services and balanced (relative to benchmark) strategies are not multi-asset (targeted return) strategies. All can be relevant for a client, but we need to be more precise in how we describe them so people can work out how they address their needs and the value of each approach, not just its price.

Anyway, it is time for me to carry out my duties as customer host for remotely situated executives seconded to Chez Coombs, i.e. take a cup of tea up to Tracey’s office.

Tune in to The Sharpe End — a multi-asset investing podcast from Rathbones. You can listen here or wherever you get your podcasts. New episodes monthly.

 

Most popular blogs

29 February 2024

Nvidia: from pastime to new paradigm

A business created to make computer game graphics more beautiful stumbled into driving AI, one of the most important technologies of the 21st century. Rathbone Greenbank Global Sustainability Fund manager David Harrison explains what all the fuss is about.

Find out more

5 mins

4 December 2024

Why active management has a place in 2025 and beyond

The rise of passive investment is storing up risks that many investors may not realise they are taking. James Crossley, our head of Rathbones Asset Management distribution, makes the case for active managers.

Find out more

3 mins

9 January 2024

2024: The Year. Maybe?

Our head of multi-asset investments David Coombs starts the new year making a three-point turn with a dump truck of salt. Behold, we have his predictions.

Find out more

3 mins

18 January 2024

Ceasing to worship at the altar of stock-pickers

Back in secondary school, our head of multi-asset investments David Coombs was a champion stock-picker. Although, he had help from his teacher’s direct line to the market – which taught him markets tend to be unfair.

Find out more

4 mins

In The KNOW blog

Read the latest news and views from our fund managers

Blog posts

Subscribe to the In The KNOW blog

You can unsubscribe at any time. For details on how we handle your data, visit our Privacy policy.

CAPTCHA

Let's Talk

Ready to start a conversation? Please complete our enquiry form, we look forward to speaking with you

Enquire
  • Important Information
    • Brexit Statement
    • Important information
    • UK Modern Slavery Act
    • Accessibility
    • Privacy
    • Cookies
    • Cookie preferences
    • Complaints
  • Important Information
    • Consumer Duty
    • Voting disclosure
    • Assessment of value reports
    • TCFD Reports
    • SDR Consumer-Facing Disclosures
    • Financial Ombudsman Service
    • Financial Services Compensation Scheme
    • Glossary of terms and FAQs
    • MIFIDPRU8
Address

Rathbones Asset Management
30 Gresham Street
London
EC2V 7QN

Rathbones Asset Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and a member of the Investment Association. A member of the Rathbone Group. Registered Office 30 Gresham Street, London EC2V 7QN. Registered in England No 02376568.

© 2025 Rathbones Group Plc
Incorporated and registered in England and Wales. Registered number 01000403

Follow us
LinkedIn
City Hive Logo
ACT Logo

Rathbones Asset Management is delighted to be an early signatory of the ACT Framework created by City Hive

Diversity Project Logo

Rathbones Asset Management is a member of The Diversity Project

The value of your investments and the income from them may go down as well as up, and you could get back less than you invested.